- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 15 November 2011
- Bench
- Veena Birbal
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1117/2011
Judgment
ORDER ls.11.2011 We have heard this matter in court as well as in Chambers. Shivani is adrnittedly 20 years old and she has clearly stated that she wants to reside with her husband (the petitioner herein). Consequently, Shivani is free to leave with her husband who is also present in court from the court premises itself. Shivani's brother was also heard in Chambers and he had clearly indicated that insofar as he is concerned, there is no difficulfy r.vith Shivani residing with her husband. The Station House Officers of the concerned Police Stations shall ensure that no untoward incident takes place with regard to this matter. With these directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. ?7ta76rrw'* ' DAR DURREZ AHMED, J 4""* n^-4 VEENA BIRBAL. J NOVEMBER 15, 2011 kks
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-17 * IN THE HIGH COUR.T OF + w.P.(cRL) rrr7t20rr ROHIT @ ROFIIT STEPHEN Through: DELHI AT NEW DELHI Ms Meenu Sharma ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS Through : Mr Pawan Sharma CORAM: IION'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL ,
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.