- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 17 September 2015
- Bench
- Hima Kohli
- Case no.
- CS(OS) 1849/2008
Judgment
O R D E R %
17.09.2015
¶1On the last date of hearing, none was present for either side. It was noted that the suit had been adjourned sine die with liberty granted to the plaintiff to file an application for seeking revival of the suit, if it would be able to obtain leave from the Company Court for prosecuting the same against the defendant. Court notice of default was issued to the plaintiff directly as also through counsel, returnable for today.
¶2As per the office report, the plaintiff and its counsel have been served. However, neither of them are present today.
¶3It appears that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the present suit, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
HIMA KOHLI, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2015/sk
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1849/2008 M/S SANGAT PRINTERS PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through : None. versus M/S DALMIA CONSUMER CARE PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.