VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Jawahar Lal v. Mcd and Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
22 February 2011
Bench
Rajiv Saiiai Endlaw
Case no.
W.P.(C) 4868/2010

Judgment

ORDER

22.02.20Lt The parties were referred to the Mediation Cell of this Court. Mediation has been successful with the efforts of N&'. Y.S. Chauhan, Mediator. A settlernent agreement signed by the parties and their counsels and the Mediator has been received. The writ petition is disposed of in terrn of the said settlement €rgl'eelxent, binding the parties thereto and with no order as to costs. CM No.2392l2011 (u/S ls1 CPC). In view of the settlernent, this application is infiuctuous and is disposed of RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW.J FEBRUARY 22,207 pp CM No.21068/201 JAWAI{AR LAL MCD AND ORS :t *{ V" -t*vta cm 4 3rufir- *fi*t'l* U rboq.o toldil + U, r, . saJ:ut/tunl dl lfftt t'' ?zo211 'f-lu,,,1 Vso $ln. €*wrf Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. "- 35$-* IN TIIE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(c) 486812010 JAWAHAR LAL ..... Petitioner llrough: None. Versus MCD AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Yashish Chandr4 Adv. for Ms. Maninder Acharya, Advocate for R-1. Counsel for the respondent No.2 (appearance not given). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAIIAI ENDLAW ORDER

23.05.2011 CM Nos.7307-08/201 I (for exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No.7306/2011 (of the respondent No.2 for modification of the Settlement Agreement)

¶1The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties before the Mediation Cell of this Court. The respondent I No.2 avers certain difficulties in irnplementation of the settlement and has sought modification of the order to the said extent.

¶2It is deemed expedient that the said matter is considered by the same - mediators who had been successful earlier in mcdiation. 'Ihe applicant w-P.(C) 4868/2010 Page I of2 t "t f-: respondent No.2 to appear before the Mediation Cell of this Court for the said purpose on 3l't May,2011 and to inform the petitioner of the same. If the petitioner does not appear, the Mediator I Mediation Cell to send the notice to the petitioner of the date of hearing before the Mediation Cell. If the matter remains unresolved, to be listed before the Court. Dasti. RAJIV SAHAI ENDI,AW, J MAY 23,2011 'gsr' ,v.P.(c) 48642010 Page 2 o! 2

Case details

Parties and counsel

t1 7) $-*C II\ THE HIGH COURT OF' DELHT AT NEW DELHI (dO 39 R 2A) in V/.P.(C) 486812010 Through: Mr. B .K. shahni, oo"rilr;ftioner VETSUS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Yashish Chandra for Ms. Maninder Acharya, Advocate for MCD. Mr. Ravi Bassi. Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAIIAI ENDLAW

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.