Krishan Kumar Sukheja & Ors v. State & Ors

ORDER o

23.07.20tti a. Quashing of F.I.R. Nos.232 and 233 of 2007 is sought by the petitioners on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. These two F.I.R.s are cross F.I.R's between the partiesrwho at the time of incident were neighbours of each other and tried to , settle their dispute by show of force. The parties later on compromised with each other and have settled their dispute with the help of Mediation Cell. Compromise arrived at between the parties in the Mediation Cell has been placed on record. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. ? L-In view of the fact that parties have compromised and the fact that the injuries received were simple in nature although they were booked under Sections 3081323 and other provisions of IPC, I consider that it is a fit case where parties should be allowed to compromise and F.I.R.s should be quashed. from these F.I.Rs. are quashed. The with Delhi High Court Legal Services SHIV NARAYA JULY 23,2010 .AA' The F.I.R.s and proceedings emanating parties shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- each Committee as costs. I f t &

I $-22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (Crl.) No.613/2008 V.K. SETH & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Mansoor Ali, Advocate. Versus STATE & ORS. ResPondents Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed & Mr. P. Mallikarjuna, Advs. for the State with S.I. Gurucharan Singh. Counsel for R-4 to 7 (name not given). WITH ' :1. 33 Crl. M.C. No.2339l2010 & Crl. M.A. No.12603/2010 KRISHAN KUMAR SUKHEJA & ORS. ..... PEtitiONETS Through: Counsel for the petitioners (name not girren). Versus , srATE & oRS' mr - -,,-. r r-- cr^r^^ ""' Respondents Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed & Mr. P. Mallikarjuna, Advs. for the State with S.I. Gurucharan Singh. Mr. Mansoor Ali, Advocate for R-2 & 3. CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA