VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Vibhu Raj Chaudhary v. State of NCT of Delhi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
1 September 2026
Bench
Madhu Jainauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 5010/2025

Judgment

O R D E R %

01.09.2026

¶1This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶2The present application has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BNSS'), seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 624/2025, registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 110, 126(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BNS').

¶3Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has joined the investigation and he has been granted interim protection by this Court vide order dated 23.12.2025.

¶4Per contra, learned APP for the State submits that though the Applicant has joined the investigation, he is not cooperating with the interrogation and The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. he has also not produced his mobile phone before the Investigating Officer ('IO').

¶5The Court has heard learned counsel for the Applicant as well as learned APP for the State.

¶6The plea of the Applicant is that the present FIR is a counterblast to the FIR registered by him against the present complainant in Baghpat, Uttar Pradesh. The chargesheet has already been filed before the learned Trial Court against co-accused persons. The injured stands discharged from the hospital.

¶7In view thereof, the present application is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the Applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions:

i) The Applicant shall join the investigation as and when required and shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer.

ii) The Applicant shall remain available on the mobile number(s) shared by him with the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer.

iii) The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make an attempt to influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence in any manner.

iv) In case of change of residential address/contact details, the Applicant shall promptly inform the same to the concerned I.O./SHO.

¶8The application is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶9Needless to state, nothing stated hereinabove shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case, and the observations made herein are confined to the consideration of the present bail application. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶10The order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026/b/m The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC011057032025 + BAIL APPLN. 5010/2025 VIBHU RAJ CHAUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Chhikara, Mr. Shrey Sahai, Mr. Harsh Sharma, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP. SI Vipin Kumar, PS. Mukherji Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.