Bindiya v. Rakesh Manchanda & Anr

Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. .! c .1 .1 her petition claiming maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C made allegations of dowry demands, giving dowry by her parents and other several other allegations against the husband and in-laws whereas she admitted during her cross examination that she was in love with the respondent before marriage and she had conducted marriage with respondent against Wishes of her parents at Arya Samaj temple by running away from her house and her parents were not even present at the time of her marriage with respondent. I conSider that the learned trial cour;t rightly observed that the applicant, who made false averments in the court, should not be believed and was not credit worthy. I find no force in this petition. The petition i, hereby dismissed with no orders to costs. N DHINGRA,J JULY 26, 2010 rd