- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 22 November 2011
- Bench
- Valmiki J. Mehta
- Case no.
- RFA 369/2011
Judgment
ORDER %
22.11.2011 Counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has handed over possession to the respondents and therefore the appeals Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. are not being pressed. The appeals are dismissed as not pressed in view of the aforesaid statement. VALMIKI J. MEHT,J "- NOVEMBER 22, 2011 ak S
0.
Case details
Parties and counsel
1.20, 21 & 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 367/2011 INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF FINANCIAL PLANNING LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. N.Raja Singh, Adv. versus KANWALJEET KAUR KOCHAR Respondent Through: None. + RFA 369/2011 INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF FINANCIAL PLANNING LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. N.Raja Singh, Adv. ',ersus SANJEEV BATRA Respondent Through: None. + RFA 370/2011 INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF FINANCIAL PLANNING LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. N.Raja, Adv. versus • ROHITANAND Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.