Naveen & Ors v. State & Ors

ORDER 0/o

21.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 63/2011 under Sections 308, 34 IPC at PS Ranhola, New Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No.2. Learned APP for the State on instructions from the Investigating Officer states that besides the Petitioners and Respondent No. 2, interest of no other person in involved in the present FIR. Respondent No.2 Mohit along with his father Sh. Rajbeer is present in person and is identified by their counsel. The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Mr. Mohit is minor and thus an affidavit has been filed by his father Sh. Raj beer stating that the matter has been settled and on behalf of his son he Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the pursuant thereto. He reiterates the same before the Court. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in r-question. Consequently, FIR No. 63/2011 under Sections 308, 34 IPC registered at PS Ranhola, New Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet m acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. MUKTA GUPTA, J NOVEMBER 21, 2011 'dk' .7 ..f lv'<:> £.jnd l:>tJnt A.dv .:bl'13.11

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2189/2011 NAVEEN&ORS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate versus STATE&ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State. Mr. Rahul Bhagat, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA