- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 17 November 2011
- Bench
- V.K. Shall
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2198/2011
Judgment
ORDER
17.11.2011 After brief submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a revision against the impugned order before the Sessions Judge. Learned APP and learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 do not have any objection. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Dasti. V.K. SHALl, l NOVEMBER 17, 2011 mr W'' / L Ir lJ I I ?! ::'! 1:: p Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
v $tv23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEVV DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2198/2011 SURAJ GUPTA ..... Petitioner 0/o 1. 2. 3. 4. Through: versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: CORAM: Mr. K. K. Manan, Mr. Mustafa Arif, Mr.Nipun Bhardwaj, Mr. Navinder Nath and Mr.Abhimanyu Dhawan, Advocates. ..... Respondents Ms.Ritu Guaba, APP Mr.M.S.Yadav, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALl
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.