Nitin Thakur & Others v. State N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors

ORDER t7.Il.20ll By this petition the Petitioners who are major seek protection as they have rnarried of their own free will contrary to the wishes of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. On a notice being issued Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are present in court. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 on instruction states that adrnittedly the Petitioner No. 2 is a major and in view of the fact that she has rnarried Petitioner No. I of her own free will they have no objection thereto. They further state that they will not interfere in happy married life of the Petitioners and would not expect any interference frorn the Petitioners. In view of the statement of the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5, the Petitioner who are present in person, do not wish to press the present petition' Petition and application are dismissed as not pressed. Wt'vL

MUKTA GUPTA, J. NOVEMBER 17,201r tvn'

L 30# $- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 98412011 & Crl. M.A. No. 7845/2011 (interirn relief) NITIN THAKUR & OTHERS ..... Petitionqrs Thropgh: Mr. Ashok Arora, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate for Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel SI Seema Singh, PS Hauz Khas. Mr. R.K. Sherawat, Advocate Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in Person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA with Mr. with