VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2015 › High Court of Delhi

Tejaswi High School Sponsored by Saktidhar Educational Society v. Educomp Solutions Limited & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
15 September 2015
Bench
J.R. Midhaauthor
Case no.
ARB.P. 119/2015

Judgment

ORDER %

15.09.2015 C<CP(O) 68/2015 I I Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition with to appointment of the arbitrator by this Court. The contempt petition I I is of as not pressed. ARB.P.I1S/2015 I [ ARB.P.119/2015 I 1 ARB.P.120/2015

¶11 j The petitioner is seeking appointment of an arbitrator under Section I 11 df the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. I

¶2i There is a valid arbitration agreement between the parties and disputes hatt arisen. under the said counsels for the parties agree to the appomtment of a sole arbItrator by thIS court.

3.1 Learned counsel for respondent submits that the respondent has five with the petitioner and the arbitrator be appointed in respect of all claims to which learned counsel for petitioner has no objection. I I

4.1 i Lealued counsel for respondent submits that the fees of the arbitrator I be!1omputed by taking the gross value of the five claims which are to the tune ofRs.l ,50,00,000/-. I , I I I

5.\! The petition is allowed and Mr. Justice P.K. Bahri (Retd.) is as sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties indlbding their claims and counter-claims. The arbitration shall take place the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre ('DAC'). The fees I I of Ithe learned Arbitrator shall be computed on the gross value of all the \ : I ! I c1a1ills between the parties

¶6Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the petitioner under the s:gnature of the Court Master. A copy of this order be delivered to the learned Arbitrator as well as Additional Coordinator, DAC forthwith. II !. i I. ' I:

J.R. MIDHA, J. 15, 2015 aki' • i, i I I ,

Case details

Parties and counsel

. i i I I I I : ! I ! & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELID AT NEW DELID + ARB.P. 118/2015 & CCP(O) 68/2015 TEJASWI HIGH SCHOOL,SPONSORED BY VEDA VANDITHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETy ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sowri Dev and Mr. Alnit Rathore, Advocates. versus i EDUCOMP SOLUTIONS LIMITED & ANR. . .... Respondents Through: Mr. Ganpathi and Mr. D.K. Devesh, I Advocates. I : I I Ms. Sonia Singhania and Mr. N.K. , I Bhatnagar, Advocates. I + ARB.P. 119/2015 TEJASWI HIGH SCHOOL SPONSORED BY SAKTIDHAR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETy ..... Petitioner I : Through: Mr. Sowri Dev and Mr. Amit . I Rathore, Advocates. I ; I I versus I ! : i II EDUCOMP SOLUTIONS LIMITED & ANR. . .... Respondents Through: Mr. Ganpathi and Mr. D.K. Devesh, Advocates. + i ; ARB.P.120/2015 TEJASWI HIGH SCHOOL RESIDENTIAL,SPONSORED BYSRI SRINIVASA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETy ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sowri Dev and Mr. Amit Rathore, Advocates. versus I ; ! I EDUCOMP SOLUTIONS LIMITED & Al\TR. . .... Respondents Through: Mr. Ganpathi and Mr. D.K. Devesh, Advocates. I : I Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. II , , I ! ,-- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.