Uday Bedi v. Red Roses Public School & Anr

O R D E R %

20.11.2025

¶1This revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ["CPC"] has been filed against an order of the Trial Court dated 14.08.2025 in CS DJ 192/2025. By the said order, an application of the respondents for amendment of the plaint was allowed.

¶2The proviso to Section 115(1) of the CPC restricts revision petitions to situations where the impugned order, had it been made in favour of the revisionist, would have disposed of the suit or proceedings. In the present case, had the application for amendment been dismissed, it would not have put an end to the suit.

¶3In this view of the matter, Ms. Varisha Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the petition, with liberty to pursue alternative remedies as may be available to the petitioner in law.

¶4The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid. PRATEEK JALAN, J NOVEMBER 20, 2025/SS/KA/ This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 322/2025, CM APPLs. 72846-72847/2025 UDAY BEDI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Varisha Sharma, Ms. Smiksha Singhroha and Ms. Shivani Aggarwal, Advocates. versus RED ROSES PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN