VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2025 › High Court of Delhi

Smt. Geeta and Ors v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
19 November 2025
Bench
Amit Mahajanauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 3806/2025

Judgment

O R D E R %

19.11.2025

¶1The present petition is filed seeking quashing of FIR No. 312/2025 dated 11.07.2025, registered at Police Station Mayur Vihar PH-I, for offences under Sections 115(2) / 126(2) / 332(c) / 351(3) / 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ('BNS').

¶2The brief facts are that Respondent No. 2 is a principal of a school in Trilokpuri. It is alleged that on 10.07.2025 at around 01:30 PM, when Respondent No. 2 was working with a teacher namely, Abid Ali, the petitioners arrived and asked whether it was the Principal's Office.

¶3It is alleged that when Respondent No. 2 replied in The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. affirmative, one of the petitioners struck Respondent No. 2 on his face with an object due to which the he got injured and his left eye began to bleed.

¶4It is alleged that Abid Ali tried to intervene, whereafter, Respondent No. 2 shouted to call his staff. It is alleged that the petitioners thereafter started to scuffle and attack the staff of Respondent No. 2.

¶5It is alleged that when Respondent No. 2 tried to escape, the petitioners surrounded him, and he heard Petitioner No. 1, who was also an employee of the school, telling other petitioners to beat Respondent No. 2. It is alleged that the petitioners also threatened to kill them.

¶6It is alleged that the staff managed to save Respondent No. 2 by locking him inside an office. Pursuant to a complaint made by Respondent No. 2 the police registered the present FIR.

¶7The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes by way of Compromise Deed dated 22.08.2025, out of their own free will, without any coercion, threat or undue influence.

¶8The parties are present in person and have been duly identified by the Investigating Officer.

¶9The petitioners tender an unconditional apology for their behaviour and undertake not to indulge into any such activity in future.

¶10On being asked, Respondent No. 2 states that he is satisfied with the apology tendered by the petitioners. He states that he has settled the disputes with the petitioners without any coercion or pressure. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶11He further states that does not wish to pursue any proceedings arising out of the present FIR and has no objection if the same are quashed.

¶12Offences under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/332(c)/351(3) of the BNS are compoundable in nature.

¶13This Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by relegating the parties to the learned Trial Court for filing an application to compound the offences.

¶14Keeping in view the nature of dispute and that the parties have amicably entered into a settlement, this Court feels that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the dispute alive and continuance of the proceedings would amount to abuse of the process of Court.

¶15However, keeping in mind the fact that the State machinery has been put to motion, ends of justice would be served if the petitioners are put to cost.

¶16In view of the above, FIR No. 312/2025 and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed, subject to payment of cost of ₹20,000/- by the petitioners to be deposited with the Delhi Police Martyrs' Fund within a period of 4 weeks.

¶17Let the proof of deposit of cost be submitted to the concerned SHO.

¶18The present petition is allowed in aforesaid terms. AMIT MAHAJAN, J NOVEMBER 19, 2025 'KDK' The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + SMT. GEETA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rahul Singh and Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advs. with all the petitioners in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with SI Vishvendra Singh, PS Mayur Vihar. Mr. Narender Kumar, Adv. for R-2. R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.