Sushil Kumar Gupta v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr

O R D E R %

19.11.2025

¶1Heard.

¶2Not only has the survey been completed, but the review period is also over. That being so, we see no reason to cause any interference at this stage.

¶3However, we leave it to the discretion of petitioner to apply afresh, in case a fresh survey is conducted. Otherwise, respondent shall proceed in accordance with the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act 2014 or Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme, 2019 framed thereunder.

¶4Petition is, accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, are This is a digitally signed order. rendered infructuous.

¶5Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J

ANISH DAYAL, J NOVEMBER 19, 2025/MK/tk

This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17579/2025 & CM APPL. 72593/2025, CM APPL. 72594/2025 SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Aggarwal and Mr. Kanhaiya, Advs. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Mr. Akshat Kulshreshtha and Mr. Soumit Ganguli, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL