- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 17 November 2025
- Bench
- Sachin Datta
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 17377/2025
Judgment
O R D E R
¶1The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the respondent no. 1/ Bar Council of Delhi and respondent no. 2/ Disciplinary Committee-III, Bar Council of Delhi to transfer the disciplinary proceedings emanating from Complaint no.232 of 2024 in terms of section 36B(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961, from respondent no.2 to respondent no.3/Bar Council of India.
¶2During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the present petition, the disciplinary proceedings qua the complaint of the petitioner, has been transferred to Bar Council of India.
¶3This redresses the primary grievance of the petitioner canvassed in the present petition.
¶4In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh in the event of any further action accruing in future.
¶5In the circumstance, the present petition stands dismissed as This is a digitally signed order. withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
SACHIN DATTA, J NOVEMBER 17, 2025/at
This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17377/2025 SUDHIR K VOHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Bhagat, Advocate. versus BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA % 17.11.2025
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.