Mukesh Yadav v. Union of India and Anr

O R D E R %

17.11.2025 CM APPL. 71963/2025

¶1Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 17411/2025, CM APPL. 71964-65/2025

¶2By the present petition, the petitioner challenges the Order dated 07.08.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') in O.A. No. 1087/2025, titled Mukesh Yadav v. M/o Railways, whereby the learned Tribunal has rejected the petitioner prayer for interim directions seeking release of his pensionary dues.

¶3The learned Tribunal has observed that the interim relief is This is a digitally signed order. relatable to the main relief itself and, therefore, cannot be granted at an interim stage.

¶4We see no reasons to differ with this view. However, as the matters involves release of pension, we request the learned Tribunal, to take up the O.A., for hearing on the next date of hearing without granting any adjournment to either of the parties.

¶5This petition, along with applications, is disposed of in above terms. NAVIN CHAWLA, J MADHU JAIN, J NOVEMBER 17, 2025/prg/P/ik This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17411/2025, CM APPL. 71964/2025 & CM APPL. 71965/2025 & CM APPL. 71963/2025. MUKESH YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashank Deo Sudhi, Mr. Aru prakash, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, SPC with Ms. Shweta Singh, Mr. Shiv Chopra & Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN