- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 17 November 2025
- Bench
- Navin Chawla, Madhu Jain
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 17397/2025
Judgment
O R D E R
¶1Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 71810/2025 (Exemption)
¶2This petition has been filed by the petitioners, challenging the Order dated 17.10.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in O.A. No.3999/2025, titled Raju Singh v. M/o Railways. W.P.(C) 17397/2025 & CM APPL. 71809/2025
¶3We find that the learned Tribunal in the Impugned Order has adequately protected the interest of the petitioners by stating that the result of the selection process shall be subject to the outcome of the O.A. pending adjudication before the learned Tribunal. We only add This is a digitally signed order. that the respondent would have to communicate the said fact to the candidates at the time of offering an appointment.
¶4Barring the above, we find no reason to interfere with the Impugned Order.
¶5The petition, along with pending application, is accordingly disposed of.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
MADHU JAIN, J NOVEMBER 17, 2025/sg/hs
This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17397/2025 RAJU SINGH AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Shrikant Prasad, Mr.Ashish Pradhan and Mr.Aryan Kumar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms.Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, CGSC with Mr.Venkat Mani Tripathi, GP, Ms.Usha Jamnal, Mr.Mohammad Junaid Mahmood and Ms.Prajna Pandita, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN % 17.11.2025
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.