- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 13 November 2017
- Bench
- Valmiki J. Mehta
- Case no.
- RSA 19/2011
Judgment
O R D E R %
13.11.2017
¶1After arguments, this appeal as also the suit be treated as withdrawn and appellant/plaintiff is granted liberty to file a suit for possession on the basis of the title, and with respect to which merits this Court makes no observation, one way or the other.
¶2It is also agreed that whatever time is spent in the present litigation will be exempted under Section 14 of the Limitation Act in case the appellant/plaintiff chooses to file a suit for possession.
¶3Liberty is given to the appellant/plaintiff to file a suit for possession in accordance with law and in such suit the respondents/ defendants will have rights to raise all defences of facts and law, as available to them.
¶4The appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of the aforesaid consent order. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J NOVEMBER 13, 2017/nn
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 19/2011 and CM APPL. 38098/2016 (O.6 R 17 CPC) VIJAY PAL SINGH ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Adnan Siddiqui and Mr.Sanchit Garga, Advocates versus VIJENDER SINGH & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. R.K. Bedi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.