VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2025 › High Court of Delhi

Sentiss Pharma Private Limited v. Amarsons Commercial Private Limited

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
14 November 2025
Bench
Prateek Jalanauthor
Case no.
C.R.P. 316/2025

Judgment

O R D E R %

14.11.2025 CM APPL. 71437/2025 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. C.R.P. 316/2025

¶1The present revision petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ["CPC"], against an order dated

14.08.2025 passed by the District Judge, Commercial Court-05, (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in Execution (COMM) No. 469/2023, by which the Commercial Court has rejected an application filed by the petitioner-decree holder for issuance of precepts under section 46 read with Order XXI Rule 23 read with Rule 24 and 43, as well as Section 51 and 151 of CPC, in respect of execution of an arbitral award dated 28.02.2022. This is a digitally signed order. 2. It may be noticed, at the outset, that interlocutory orders of the Commercial Court are not subject to revision in view of Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Even otherwise, the issuance of precept would, in any event, not dispose of the execution proceedings and the revision petition is, therefore, not maintainable in view of the proviso to Section 115 (1) of CPC.

¶3The present revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. The petitioner is free to take appropriate remedies, as may be available to it in law. PRATEEK JALAN, J NOVEMBER 14, 2025 Dy/AD/ This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 316/2025 SENTISS PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sapra, Mr. Siddharth, Mr. Tarun Kumar and Ms. Nivedita, Advocates versus AMARSONS COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.