- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 14 November 2025
- Bench
- Saurabh Banerjee
- Case no.
- CM(M) 2186/2025
Judgment
O R D E R %
14.11.2025
¶1Although, the petitioner seeks to challenge three collective orders being 23.10.2024, 17.10.2025 and 18.10.2025, however, without adverting to the merits involved, and so as to clear the way for maintainability of the present petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she is willing to give up the reliefs qua the orders dated 23.10.2024 and
17.10.2025 with liberty to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law and restrain her submissions in the present petition to the order dated
18.10.2025.
¶2This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties.
¶3Prima facie, this Court finds no reasons for interfering with the order dated 18.10.2025, however, considering that the present petition is arising out of a guardianship petition pending before the learned Family Court and is involving a six years old son, for the betterment of the child as also in the interest of justice, it is felt appropriate to allow the presence of the mother during the visit of the father before the Child Counsellor, if it is so deemed fit, proper and appropriate by the Child Counsellor. This is This is a digitally signed order. also in view of the fact that since the child has been residing with the mother for the last one and a half years.
¶4In view of the aforesaid, the rest of the terms in terms of the impugned order remains same.
¶5As such, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J. NOVEMBER 14, 2025/bh This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 2186/2025, CAV 438/2025, CM APPL. 71358/2025, CM APPL. 71359/2025 SHRUTI ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sudershani, Adv. versus VARUN ARORA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shruti Arora, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.