- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 10 July 2013
- Bench
- Manmohan
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 3921/2013
Judgment
ORDER %
10.07.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners states that neither the appeals filed by petitionersagainstthe judgmentand order dated 3'^'' April, 2013 passed by the SDM, Kapashera are being heard nor any order has been passed in the stay applications by the Deputy Commissioner (South West), Kaspashera. Consequently, present writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner (South West), Kapashera to decide the stay applications within a period of four weeks of receipt of this order. The appeals are also directed to be heard and disposed of as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months of receipt of this order. W.P.(C)3804/2013,3828/2013, 3920/2013,3921/2013 Page 2 of3 Partiesare directedto appearbeforethe DeputyCommissioner(South West),Kapasheraon 26^ July,2013 at3.00p.m. It is clarified that even the issue whether the cost imposed by the SDM has to be paid or not shall be decided by the Deputy Commissioner (South West), Kapashera at the interim stage. Till the stay applicationsare decided by the Deputy Commissioner (SouthWest), Kapashera,petitionersshall not be dispossessedwithoutdue process of law. •fhis Court may mentionthat it has neither dealt with nor expressed any opinion on the merits of the cases. With the aforesaid observations, present writ petitions and pending applications stand disposed of Order dasti. , MANMOHANrJ-JULY 10,2013 m W.P.(C) 3804/2013,3828/2013,3920/2013,3921/2013 Page 3 of3
Case details
Parties and counsel
M #18-21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 18. + W.P.(C) 3804/2013 & C.M. APPL. 7107-7108/2013 HARDWARI & OTHERS Petitioners Through Mr. Mohit Ramdeo, Advocate versus GAON SABHA KliARKHARI O JATMAL & ORS Respondents Through Mr. JoginderSukhija,Advocate AND 19. + W.P.(C) 3828/2013 & C.M. APPL. 7132-7133/2013 RAMPHAL Petitioner Through Mr. Mohit Ramdeo, Advocate versus GAON SABHA KHARKHARI JATMAL & ANR Respondents Through Mr. Joginder Sukhija,Advocate AND 20. + W.P.(C) 3920/2013 & & C.M. APPL. 7313-7314/2013 BRAHM Petitioner Through Mr. Mohit Ramdeo, Advocate versus GAON SABHA KHARKHARI JATMAL& ANR Respondents Through Mr. JoginderSukhija,Advocate W.P.(C) 3804/2013,3828/2013, 3920/2013,3921/2013 Page1of3 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. T V--. AND 21. + W.P.(C) 3921/2013 & & C.M. APPL. 7315-7316/2013 RAJENDER SINGH Petitioner Through Mr. Mohit Ramdeo, Advocate versus GAON SABHA KHARKHARI JATMAL & ANR Respondents Through Mr. Joginder Sukhija, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.