VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2008 › High Court of Delhi

Autodesk, Inc & Anr v. Mr. Sahukar & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
6 June 2008
Bench
Vacation Bench(S.B.)(Sr.)author
Case no.
CS(OS) 1009/2008

Judgment

#0S-14 % 06.06.2008 Present: Ms. Aarshia Behl, Advocate for Plaintiffs. Ms. Mamta Tiwari, Advocate with Ms. Pooja Duld and Mr. Mukul Baweja, Advocates for Defendant No. 2. +i.A. No. 6509/2008 & 6510/2008 * Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CS (OS) No. 1009/2008 Learned Counsel for Plaintiffs states that she has instructions to drop Defendant No. 1 from the array of parties. ^ Accordingly,at oral request of learned counsel for Plaintiffs,name of Defendant No. 1 is deleted from the array of parties. Let amended memo of parties be filed in the course of the day. I.A. No. 7227/2008 (compromise) The parties have filed a joint application under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for recording of terms of settlement arrived at between the parties which are mentioned in para 2 of the said application. The application is signed by constituted attorney of the Plaintiff as well as authorized representative of Defendant No. 2 and their Counsel. The said application is also supported by the affidavits of constituted attorney of Plaintiffs and authorized representative of Defendant No.

¶2The terms and conditions of Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. settlement as incorporated in para 2 of the said application reads as follows "a. The Defendants have represented and undertaken that as on the date of signing of the present Application the usage of the Plaintiff's software at its premises is licensed. b. The Defendants undertal<e to pay the Plaintiffs Legal Costs and Damages, payable in the name of 'Saikrishna & Associates', amounting to Rs. 40,00,000/- (Rupees Fourty Lakhs only). c. The Defendants further undertake that they will not p-3t any time in the future use/reproduce/store, pirated/unlicensed software titles of the Plaintiffs." Accordingly the present suit and I.A. No. 7227/2008 are disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties leaving the parties to bear their own costs. All interim orders passed by this Court stand vacated. Let decree sheet be prepared incorporating therein the above mentioned terms and conditions. Order dasti. Manprr^Ran (Vacation Judge) June 06, 2008 m <n

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.