Pran Ganju v. Sudhir Krishna Thr Union of India & Ors

ORDER

01.11.2012%?•? Mr B.V. Niren and Mr Jatan Singh, who appear for respondent nos. 1 and 2 in contempt petition nos. 360/2012 and 361/2012 respectively, contend that even though the contempt petitions are beyond limitations, the respondents are agreeable to the directions being issued in the present Page of2CONT.CAS(C) 360/2012 & 361/2012? contempt petitions which were issued by this Court in WP(C) No. 4989/2012. Ms Mathur, who appears for the petitioner, has been shown the copy of the order passed in the said writ petition. She is agreeable to the contempt petitions being disposed of in terms of the directions contained in WP(C) 4989/20 12 vide order dated 17.08.20 12. It is ordered accordingly. The contempt petitions are disposed of. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J NOVEMBER 01, 2012 kk ? Page 2 of 2CONT.CAS(C) 360/2012 & 361/2012 S

? $43 & 13* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ±?CONT.CAS(C) 360/2012 PetitionerPRAN GANJU? Through: Ms Meera Mathur, Adv. versus SUDHIR KRISHNA THR UNION OF RespondentsINDIA &ORS? Through: Mr B.V. Niren, CGSC with Mr Prasouk Jam, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr Achal Gupta, Adv. for R-3. AND •? +?CONT.CAS(C) 361/2012 PetitionerANJALI VARMA? Through: Ms Meera Mathur, Adv. versus SUDHIR KRISHNA THR UNION OF Respondents?INDIA & ORS Through: Mr Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr Tushar Singh, Adv. for R-1&2. Mr Achal Gupta, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER