VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Ritesh Kumar v. Smt. Kajal & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
21 December 2011
Bench
Mx. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 1969/2011

Judgment

ORDER %

21.12.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No 198/2008, P.S. South Rohini under Section 498-A/406/34 IPG on the ground that the parties have inter se compromised the matter. FIR was registered on the complaint of the respondent . No. Iv Ritesh Kohli, petitioner No. 1 and Kajal, respondent No. 1 after marriage have divorced each other on 11.11.2011 by way of mutual consent. Both the parties are present in person and are identified by their respective counsels. The respondent No. 1, who is the complainant and the petitioner state that they have compromised the matter and now there is no dispute left. Respondent No. 1 states that she has compromised the matter with the petitioners out of her own free will and volition and without any pressure or coercion of any sort and now, she is left with no grievance against the petitioners and she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. In view of the foregoing and the fact that the parties have amicably <^1 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. resolved dl their disputes, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the FIR. Accordingly, FIR No 198/2008, P.S. South Rohini under Section 498-A/406/34 IPC and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are herby quashed. Bail bonds of the petitioners are cancelled and their sureties are discharged. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. M.L. MEHTA,J DECEMBER 21,2011

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-19 * m THE fflGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1969/2011 RITESH KUMAR Petitioner Through: Mr S.K. Chawla, Advocate versus SMT. KAJAL & ANR. Respondent Through: Mr. Y.R. Shar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MX. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.