Manoj Kumar v. Sangeeta

O R D E R

¶1At the outset, it has been put to the learned counsel for the appellant as to how are the present appeals under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act maintainable before this Court.

¶2After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellant submits that This is a digitally signed order. instead of pressing the present appeals, the appellant be granted the liberty will avail of other appropriate remedy as per law for challenging the impugned order(s).

¶3The appeals alongwith the pending applications are, as prayed for, disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the appellant to assail the impugned order(s) by way of appropriate remedies available as per law.

¶4Further we make it clear that since we have not expressed any opinion on the grounds raised in either of the two appeals, it will be open for the appellant to raise all grounds permissible in law including the grounds raised in the present appeals in any fresh proceedings which the appellant choose to initiate.

REKHA PALLI, J

SAURABH BANERJEE, J NOVEMBER 21, 2024/rr

This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAT.APP.(F.C.) 380/2024, CM APPL. 67774/2024-Stay, CM APPL. 67775/2024-Exp, CM APPL. 67776/2024-Delay 116 days NAVEEN KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Ms. Puja Jakhar, Mr. Harshit Prakash and Mr. Krishan Chauhan, Advs. versus KAVITA .....Respondent Through: None + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 381/2024, CM APPL. 67777/2024-Stay, CM APPL. 67778/2024-Exp, CM APPL. 67779/2024-Delay 116 days MANOJ KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Ms. Puja Jakhar, Mr. Harshit Prakash and Mr. Krishan Chauhan, Advs. versus SANGEETA .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE % 21.11.2024