- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 19 November 2024
- Bench
- Ravinder Dudeja
- Case no.
- CM(M) 3845/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
19.11.2024 CM APPL. 67209/2024 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 3845/2024 and CM APPL. 67208/2024 (stay)
¶1This petition challenges the order dated 12.11.2024 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Appellate Tribunal, Municipal Corporation of Delhi [AT, MCD] .
¶2The impugned order vacated the interim stay granted on 24.05.2024 and listed the matter for 18.03.2024 for arguments on the interim application.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order was passed without granting opportunity of hearing at the back of the petitioner while he was held up in Supreme Court. This is a digitally signed order. 4. After some arguments, learned counsel does not want to press the present petition.
¶5In view of the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, petitioner is granted liberty to file an application before the ATMCD for early hearing of the interim stay application.
¶6It is clarified that no observation has been made in this order on the merits of the case, and all rights and contentions of the parties on merits are left open. RAVINDER DUDEJA, J NOVEMBER 19, 2024/ib This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 3845/2024 SATBIR SINGH SEHWAG .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Samman Vardhan Gautam and Mr. Praphull Kumar, Advocate. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Adv. with Ms. Shweta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.