Saurabh Singhal v. Delhi Jal Board Through Its Ceo

O R D E R %

01.09.2026

¶1In the status report filed on behalf of respondent/Delhi Jal Board

(DJB) on 29th January, 2026, it is stated that de-silting of the sewer line in the back side of the street has already been carried out by DJB.

¶2In the subsequent affidavit filed on behalf of DJB on 7th March, 2026, it is stated that the site was inspected on 27th February, 2026 and during inspection, it was found that there is no blockage in the DJB sewer line either at the front or at the back side of the said premises.

¶3Petitioner, who appears in-person, submits that the connecting sewage pipes from the house of the petitioner to the main sewer line are old and rusty and need to be replaced.

¶4Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/DJB submits that there is nothing to indicate that the said connecting pipes are not operational. He has handed over photographs taken yesterday, i.e., 31st August, 2026 to This is a digitally signed order. W.P.(C) 16110/2025 show that there is no water logging in the area at all.

¶5Considering the aforesaid submissions, the present writ petition is disposed of.

¶6Liberty is given to the petitioner to take appropriate remedies in law in the event any further grievance arises after filing a complaint with the DJB.

¶7The pending application stands disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 Vivek/- This is a digitally signed order.

W.P.(C) 16110/2025 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010809522025 + W.P.(C) 16110/2025 & CM APPL. 65989/2025 SAURABH SINGHAL .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person. versus DELHI JAL BOARD THROUGH ITS CEO .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj P. Agarwala and Mr. Vipul Singh, Advocates for DJB. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL