VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Aas Mohd v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
14 November 2024
Bench
Manoj Kumar Ohriauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 3580/2024

Judgment

O R D E R %

14.11.2024

¶1The present matter has been received on transfer and is listed by way of a supplementary list.

¶2By way of present petition, the petitioner seeks parole for a period of 60 days in FIR No.859/2004 registered under Sections 302/201/34 IPC & Section 25 Arms Act at P.S. Sangam Vihar, New Delhi on the ground that his wife has given birth to a child on 03.11.2024 and requires the presence of the petitioner to take care of her and the newborn child.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has earlier been released on parole and in this regard has referred to the order dated 19.04.2023 passed in W.P.(CRL) 957/2023. He further submits that the present petition is supported by the requisite medical documents.

¶4The matter was passed over at the first call at request of learned Standing Counsel for the State, who sought time to carry out the verification. At the second call, learned Standing Counsel submits that the petitioner's documents have been verified. This is a digitally signed order. 5. In view of the above and considering that the grounds urged in the petition already stand verified, it is directed that the petitioner be released on parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release, subject to him furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/-with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent/Duty J.M./Link J.M./concerned Court and subject to the following conditions :-

i) The petitioner shall not leave the Delhi NCR without prior permission of the concerned Court;

ii) At the time of furnishing bail bond, the petitioner would specify the mobile number, which he undertakes to keep operational during the period of his release;

iii) In case of change of residential address or contact details, the petitioner shall promptly inform the same to the concerned Investigating Officer as well as to the concerned Court.

iv) The petitioner shall not directly/indirectly try to get in touch with the complainant or any other prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

v) The petitioner shall surrender upon expiry of the parole period.

¶6In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of.

¶7Copy of the order be communicated to the concerned Jail Superintendent electronically for information and necessary compliance.

¶8Copy of the order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J NOVEMBER 14, 2024 na This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3580/2024 AAS MOHD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for State with SI Raghuraj Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.