Truth Fashion Through Proprietorship Sadia v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax Dgst

O R D E R %

18.11.2024

¶1The solitary grievance of the writ petitioner is a failure on the part of the respondents to process the refund application of the petitioner submitted in consequence to the order dated 10 May 2024 passed by the Objection Hearing Authority, the Additional Commissioner.

¶2Mr. Aggarwal, learned counsel who appears on behalf of the respondent, states that subject to due verification of all facts and contentions on merits being kept open, the respondent shall ensure that the claim for refund is disposed of with expedition and preferably within a period of three weeks from today. The statement so made is recorded and accepted.

¶3The aforesaid direction shall be subject to any orders that may This is a digitally signed order. be obtained by the respondents on any statutory appeal that they may choose to prefer and orders that may be passed thereon.

¶4The petition shall stand disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

YASHWANT VARMA, J.

DHARMESH SHARMA, J. NOVEMBER 18, 2024/DR

This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15886/2024 TRUTH FASHION THROUGH PROPRIETORSHIP SADIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M. A. Ansari, Ms. Tabbassum Firdause and Mr. Ahmad, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DGST .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA