VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Rohit Sujanani v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 November 2011
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 1699/2010

Judgment

ORDER o

24.11.2011 CRL.M.C. 1699/2010 & Crl.M.A. 6603/2010 (stay) Learned counsel for the parties state that the matter has been settled between the parlies and in tenns of the settlement the statement for second motion for divorce by mutual consent has alreadv been recorded on llth ;\ November,20lI. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that since the parties have settled the matter, he be permitted to withdraw the present petition with libefly to file a proper petition seeking quashing on the basis of compromise. Leave and liberly grantec. Petition and application are disrnissed as withdrawn. CRL.M.C. 1699/2010 p&ge I oJ'2 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. \) ) Crl.M.A. 327912011 (rernoval of LOC) Since the parties have amicable settled the matter, the LOC opened against the Petitioner is hereby quashed. Application is disposed of. Order dasti. Aa ^l-l- /1 t re-- MUKTA GUPTA,J NOVEMBER 24.2OII 'ga' CRL.M.C. 1699/2010 page 2 of2

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-19 'Y" * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + cItL.M.C. 169912010 ROHIT SUJANANI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ranjay N., Adv. VCTSUS STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for State with SI Rahul Saini, PS C.R. Park. Mr. Arun VOhra. Adv. for R-2. a coRAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.