- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 24 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 1699/2010
Judgment
ORDER o
24.11.2011 CRL.M.C. 1699/2010 & Crl.M.A. 6603/2010 (stay) Learned counsel for the parties state that the matter has been settled between the parlies and in tenns of the settlement the statement for second motion for divorce by mutual consent has alreadv been recorded on llth ;\ November,20lI. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that since the parties have settled the matter, he be permitted to withdraw the present petition with libefly to file a proper petition seeking quashing on the basis of compromise. Leave and liberly grantec. Petition and application are disrnissed as withdrawn. CRL.M.C. 1699/2010 p&ge I oJ'2 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. \) ) Crl.M.A. 327912011 (rernoval of LOC) Since the parties have amicable settled the matter, the LOC opened against the Petitioner is hereby quashed. Application is disposed of. Order dasti. Aa ^l-l- /1 t re-- MUKTA GUPTA,J NOVEMBER 24.2OII 'ga' CRL.M.C. 1699/2010 page 2 of2
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-19 'Y" * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + cItL.M.C. 169912010 ROHIT SUJANANI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ranjay N., Adv. VCTSUS STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for State with SI Rahul Saini, PS C.R. Park. Mr. Arun VOhra. Adv. for R-2. a coRAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.