- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 30 November 2011
- Bench
- Mx. Mehta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 1679/2011
Judgment
ORDER
30.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 12/2008, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG, registered at P.S. Sarai Rohilla on the ground that the parties have inter se compromised the matter. FIR was registered on the complaint of the respondent No. 2/Vidhi Garg. Both the parties are present in person and are identified by their respective counsels and the Investigating Officer. The respondent No. 2 was married to the petitionerNo. 1 on 28.6.2007 but due to matrimonial discord between the two. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. ultimately,their marriagehas been dissolvedby way of a decree of divorce by mutual consent vide orders dated 4.4.2011. The respondent No. 2, who is the complainantand the petitionersstate that they have compromisedthe matter and now there is no dispute left. In terms of the settlement, out of total settlement amount of Rs. 11 lakhs, a sum of Rs.8 lakhs have already been paid to the respondentNo. 2 and the balanceRs. 3 lakhs is beingpaid today by way of a pay order in her name. RespondentNo. 2 states that she has compromisedthe matter withthe petitionersout of her ownfree will andvolitionand withoutany pressure or coercion of any sort and now, she is left with no grievance against the petitionersand shehas no objectionifthepresentFIRis quashed. In view of the foregoingandthe factthatthe partieshave amicablyresolved all their disputes,no useful purposewould be served by continuingwith the FIR. Accordingly,FIR No. 12/2008, under Sections 498A/406/34IPG, registered at P.S. Sarai Rohilla and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are •hereby quashed. Bail bonds of the petitionersare cancelledand their suretiesare discharged. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. MX. MEHTA,J NOVEMBER 30, 2011 akb
Case details
Parties and counsel
A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1679/2011 % SUNNY GARG & ORS Through: versus Petitioner Petitioners in person with Mr. C.L.Gupta, Advocate. STATE & ANR Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP with WASI Santosh, P.S.. Sarai Rohilla. R2 in person with Mr. Vivek Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MX. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.