- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 22 November 2011
- Bench
- Indermeet Kaur
- Case no.
- RC.REV. 197/2011
Judgment
ORDER o/o
22.t1".2OL1' Learned. counsel for the respondent has pointed out that the directions contained in the order dated 19.08.201-L have not been complied with and the user charges in the sum of Rs.5,000/- per month have not been paid; contention of the respondent is that the protection granted to the tenant against dispossession should now be withdrawn. The order dated 19.08.2011 not having been complied with the interim protection granted to the tenant is accordingly withdrawn. None has appeared for the. Petitioner. It is obvious that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present litigation. Petition is dismissed in default as also for non-prosecution. Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of the ' Court Master INDERMEET KAUR, J NOVEMBER 22. ?OLT rb q Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
"". J :ts $-37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 1-9712O1-1- and CM No. 209O1-/2O1-1- BK GARG ..... Petitioner Through: None. versus BHAGWAT DAYAL ..... ResPondent Through: Mr. R.K. Ja.in and Mr. Brijesh Kr. Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.