VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Jp Jain v. Mahesh Kumar

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
16 November 2011
Bench
Indermeet Kaurauthor
Case no.
RC.REV. 184/2011

Judgment

ORDER o/o

16.11.2011 The order impugned before this court is the order dated

31.03.2011 vide which the application for leave to defend filed by the tenant in the pending petition under section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (DRCA) had been allowed: the ARC had held that the triable issues have been raised by the tenant. The matter is under trial. Petitioner evidence stands closed. The next date fixed before the ARC is 17.12.201'J, for the evidence of respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent states that only one witness has to be examined on behalf of the respondent and the said witness shall be examined on the next date of hearing i.e. 17.12.2011, The Trial Court shall ensure that no unnecessary adjournment is granted and the said witness is examined on the said date. Trial Court shall also ensure expeditious disposal of the case. DELHI AT ..... Petitioner Mr. ManinderJeet Singh, Adv, lt: Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. a"r With these directions, petition not being pressed it is disposed INDERMEET KAUR, J of. Copy of the order be given dasti under the signatures of the I Court Master. II('/ NOVEMBER I.6, ?OLT rb \j r

Case details

Parties and counsel

a,i' " NEW DELHI $-20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF + RC.REV. I84I2OIL JP JAIN Through: VCTSUS MAHESH KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bharat Singh Sisodia, Adv. with respondent-in-person. CORAM: r HoN'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.