- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 19 November 2025
- Bench
- Amit Bansal
- Case no.
- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 374/2025
Judgment
O R D E R %
19.11.2025
¶1This court vide order dated 12th September, 2025 had passed the following directions: "17. Consequently, till the next date of hearing, the respondent is restrained from interfering/ disrupting the operation and functioning of the subject property located at plot no. 1, Vaishali Marg, Near National Handloom, R.F.C. Colony, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Respondent is also restrained from creating impediments in the ingress and egress of the petitioner and/or its representatives and agents."
¶2Subsequently, another application was filed on behalf of the petitioner alleging that the respondent has failed to comply with the aforesaid order.
¶3Accordingly, a direction was issued to the SHO, Vaishali Marg Police Station, Jaipur, Rajasthan to ensure that the order passed by this Court on 12th September, 2025 is fully complied with by the respondent.
¶4Counsel appears on behalf of the respondent and submits that the respondent is no longer in possession of the subject property. Therefore, This is a digitally signed order. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 374/2025 without admitting to the averments made in the petition in any manner, the respondent does not object if the directions contained in paragraph 17 of the order passed on 12th September, 2025 are confirmed.
¶5Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of confirming the directions contained in paragraph 17 of the order dated 12th September, 2025.
¶6It is clarified that this order shall operate till such time the Arbitral Tribunal decides the petitioner's application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, if so filed. AMIT BANSAL, J NOVEMBER 19, 2025 Rzu This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 374/2025 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 374/2025 with I.A. 28797/2025 OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra, Ms. Mrinmayee Sahu and Mr. Tribhuvan, Advocates. versus AMIT KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Yadav, Mr. Deepak Swami and Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.