- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 14 November 2025
- Bench
- Prateek Jalan
- Case no.
- C.R.P. 260/2025
Judgment
O R D E R %
14.11.2025
¶1After some hearing, Mr. Rajiv Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner – Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Private Limited, seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, who is the defendant in the suit, before the Trial Court.
¶2Mr. Tyagi further submits that the cause of action of the plaintiff [respondent herein] would have to be adjudicated against the Municipal Corporation of Delhi ["MCD"] and its agent through whom the machine, which allegedly caused injury to the plaintiff, was installed. This aspect, however, need not be examined in the present revision petition, and the parties are at liberty to raise the same before the Trial Court, if so advised.
¶3It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on This is a digitally signed order. C.R.P. 260/2025 this aspect or on the merits of the petition.
¶4In view of the above, the revision petition, alongwith the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, with these observations. PRATEEK JALAN, J NOVEMBER 14, 2025 "pv"/SD/ This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
C.R.P. 260/2025 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 260/2025 & CM APPL. 57830/2025 HINDUSTAN COCA-COLA BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Tyagi & Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocates. versus RAJESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Respondent in Person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.