- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 19 November 2024
- Bench
- Manoj Jain
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 10717/2006
Judgment
O R D E R %
19.11.2024
W.P.(C) 10717/2006 & CM APPL. 66261/2024 (for withdrawal of
the petition)
¶1Petitioner, by virtue of the above said application seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the respondent Authority seeking conversion of leasehold into freehold.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition may be treated as a representation by the respondent Authority and they may be requested to consider the same in accordance with law.
¶3Learned counsel for the respondent - DDA has no objection to the above said proposal and they would consider the said petition as a representation in accordance with law.
¶4Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the This is a digitally signed order. W.P.(C) 10717/2006
direction to the respondent to consider the present writ petition as a representation and to dispose of the same in accordance with law.
¶5Needless to say, in case the petitioner s feel themselves aggrieved again, they would be at liberty to take appropriate remedial action in accordance with law.
MANOJ JAIN, J
NOVEMBER 19, 2024
st This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
W.P.(C) 10717/2006 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10717/2006 M/S SYMPHONY CELEBRATORS P.LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajender Agarwal, Advocate. versus D.D.A. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Katyal, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Chand Chopra, Ms. Yogya Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.