VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Dipak Bhattacharya v. Officer In-Charge Consumer Education and Protection Cell Reserve Bank of India

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
20 November 2024
Bench
Manoj Jainauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 12952/2024

Judgment

O R D E R %

20.11.2024

¶1Petitioner – Dipak Bhattacharya has filed two different petitions.

¶2According to him, he has received two e-mails from Centralised Receipt and Processing Centre (CRPC) regarding receipt of complaint stated to have been filed by him.

¶3In W.P.(C) 12952/2024, the acknowledgment is with respect to the complaint dated 30.07.2024 14:12:36 against State Bank of India This is a digitally signed order. W.P.(C) 12952/2024 &

W.P.(C) 13128/2024

and in W.P.(C) 13128/2024, the complaint is dated 30.07.2024 14:54:43 against Bank of Baroda.

¶4According to the petitioner, he had never raised any such complaint.

¶5In the present petitions, he merely seeks the copies of the complaints which are alleged to have been made by him qua which the acknowledgments have been sent to him through electronic mode.

¶6Learned counsel for the respondents appears on advance notice and accepts notice and submits that he has no reservation in supplying the copies of the complaints to learned counsel for the petitioner on his e-mail which has now been shared with learned counsel for the respondent/RBI.

¶7Learned counsel for the respondents submits that he would share the requisite details within five days from today.

¶8In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is left with no grievance in the present matter and does not press his petitions. He submits that on receipt of the copies of the complaints, he would explore as to what other permissible action, if any, is available to the petitioner under the law.

¶9The petitions stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

MANOJ JAIN, J

NOVEMBER 20, 2024

st This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

W.P.(C) 12952/2024 & W.P.(C) 13128/2024 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12952/2024 DIPAK BHATTACHARYA …..Petitioner Through: Mr. Faiz Khan, Advocate. versus OFFICER IN-CHARGE CONSUMER EDUCATION AND PROTECTION CELL RESERVE BANK OF INDIA …..Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma with Mr. Ayush Srivastava and Mr. Snehashish Bhattacharya, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 13128/2024 DIPAK BHATTACHARYA …..Petitioner Through: Mr. Faiz Khan, Advocate. versus OFFICER IN-CHARGE CONSUMER EDUCATION AND PROTECTION CELL RESERVE BANK OF INDIA …..Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma with Mr. Ayush Srivastava and Mr. Snehashish Bhattacharya, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.