Mankind Pharma Limited v. Pranjali Swapnil Pimprikar Trading As A2 Lifesciences & Anr

O R D E R %

20.11.2024

¶1Counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes.

¶2The terms of the settlement, duly signed by the counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, have been handed over in Court. The terms of settlement are as follows: The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. a. The its tradem acknowle trademark b. The the trade dress whi trademark e defendant no.1 acknowledges the rig mark/trade dress - dges the plaintiff to be the exclusive k/trade dress; e defendant no.1 agrees and undertak dress / or any o ich may be identical/deceptively sim k/trade dress / ghts of the plaintiff in / , and proprietor of the said kes that it will not use other trade mark/trade milar to the Plaintiff's ; The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. c. The defendant no.1 confirms that it will change the trade dress of its "ALL OK+" product to the new trade dress provided as under: d. That, in terms of the undertaking given by the defendant no.1, the plaintiff agrees to not press for the reliefs of damages and rendition of accounts.

¶3For the purpose of good order and record, the Registry will scan a copy of the settlement so that it remains embedded in the case file.

¶4It is further agreed between the parties that the defendants shall be free to use the trademark "ALL OK+" so long as the trade dress is not similar to that of the plaintiff. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶5Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of the settlement.

¶6Decree sheet be drawn up.

¶7In view of the fact that the matter has been settled at an early stage, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of 100% of the Court Fees in favour of the plaintiff, in terms of Section 16 of the CourtFees Act, as applicable to Delhi. AMIT BANSAL, J NOVEMBER 20, 2024 Vivek/- The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.A. 42673/2024 IN + CS(COMM) 709/2024 MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ankur Sangal, Mr. Ankit Arvind, Mr. Shashwat Rakshit and Ms. Nidhi Pathak, Advocates. versus PRANJALI SWAPNIL PIMPRIKAR TRADING AS A2 LIFESCIENCES & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Shravya Pathak and Mr. Rohit Pradhan, Advocates for D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL