Sita Ram & Ors v. State & Anr

ORDER

07.12.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 27212009 under Section 45213231325/506/34IPC registered at P.S. Narela, Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No. 2. Though amended memo of parties has been filed, learned counsel for the State points out that there are as many as seven injured however only six injured have been impleaded as parfy and Rajesh Kumar s/o Ishwar Singh has not been made apaf. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that Rajesh Kumar is also present in Court and he has also agreed to the settlement arrived at between the parties. Learned counsel for the State on instructions from the investigating officer states that besides the Petitioners 1 to 10, there is no accused involved in the FIR and besides Respondent No. 2to 7 and Rajesh Kumar s/o Ishwar Singh no other victim is involved. Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 and Rajesh Kumar s/o Ishwar Singh are present w.P.(cRL) 8s9l20rr SITA RAM & ORS Through VETSUS STATE & ANR Through o/o \ Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. .al L 'f!. n tt.{ t,, in Court and identified by their counsel and the investigatir,rg offrcer. They state that they have settled the matter and do net want to pursue the FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom. In view of the' fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No. 27212009 under Section 452132313251506/34 IPC registered at P.S. Narela, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.^ W MUKTA GUPTA,J . DECEMBER jb. :o' 3i*, l<otr9 €,q\rsR 07,2011 n-z @4&r)t tq..Aa.s^"4 2'"d y.T 9 trW'lr ? C^LuA\ n\ \ ffnJlt{,c,{ Lo bv i6WAV'tw7 iS-"J.'rn .-eL 8 [aJu-r' - , t -Yt )a"tYrN-' 5/'s.{s (/ ' -( or$"*- "h* 6 Rll + $ctP'' 9lr-'14ei= 6r-\ l.Li

./ 29 $- * IN TIIE HIGH CQURT OF DELIil AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioner Mr. Anand Prakash, Advocate with Petitioners in person. ..... Respondent Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, proxy counsel for Mr. Pawan Sharma, SC for State with SI Rajbir Singh. ldr. S.R. Parashar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MTIKTA GUPTA