VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Rashid Zafar Haq v. National Investigation Agency

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
31 August 2026
Bench
Navin Chawlaauthor, Ravinder Dudeja
Case no.
CRL.A. 1017/2025

Judgment

O R D E R %

31.08.2026

¶1After some arguments, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of the subsequent developments and the other issues not being taken before the learned Trial Court on the earlier occasion when the bail was dismissed vide the impugned order dated

07.12.2024, the present appeal be disposed of granting liberty to the appellant to move a fresh Bail Application before the learned Trial Court. He further prays that the impugned order, however, should not prejudice the decision on such an application.

¶2The learned SPP for the respondent does not oppose the prayer made. This is a digitally signed order. 3. We, even otherwise, find merit in the said contention as much water has flown between the passing of the impugned order and today.

¶4We, therefore, dispose of this appeal, reserving liberty in the appellant to file a fresh Bail Application before the learned Trial Court raising all the contentions. We make it clear that the impugned order shall not come in the way of the learned Trial Court in deciding such application afresh remaining uninfluenced by any observation made in the impugned order. We further clarify that the dismissal of the Bail Application by the impugned order will also not prejudice the appellant in such decision. The Bail Application, if moved by the appellant, be decided by the learned Trial Court within a period of two months of its filing.

¶5The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J AUGUST 31, 2026/lks/ma/as This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010476572025 + CRL.A. 1017/2025 RASHID ZAFAR HAQ .....Appellant Through: Mr. M.S. Khan, Ms. Qausar khan, Mr. Zahbi Tihami, Advocates. versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, SPP with Mr. Jatin, Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Shubham Goyal, Mr. Amit Rohila, Mr. Avinash Kumar Singh, Mr. Priyansh Raj Singh, Advocates and DSP Abhinav Kajla, CIO, Insp. Lalit Sharma, AIO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.