- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 19 July 2023
- Bench
- Dinesh Kumar Sharma
- Case no.
- BAIL APPLN. 3660/2022
Judgment
J U D G M E N T
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)
¶1Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the present case, SFIO initiated the investigation in 2016 and the complaint case titled "Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Comsic Structures Ltd. & Ors" bearing CC No. CC/1313/2021 was filed before the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, Special Judge (companies Act), Dwarka, New Delhi in the year 2021.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner was never arrested during the course of the investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would be satisfied if a direction is given to the learned Trial Court to consider his application in accordance with the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation (2022) SCC OnLine SC 825 and Deepak Jha v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr. by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in CRL. M.A. 21757/2022 & Bail APPLN. 2633/2022 decided on 06.02.2023.
¶3On behalf of SFIO, it has been submitted that the counter affidavit is ready and they shall file the same. It has also been submitted that the present case is very serious in nature and is required to be considered from a different angle. Learned counsel for SFIO further submits that they would be satisfied if the bail application is considered by the learned Trial Court on merits and in accordance with the law.
¶4In view of the submissions made by learned counsels for both the
parties, let the application be moved for bail before the learned Trial Court and the learned Trial Court is directed to consider and dispose of the same as per law and the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
¶5With these observations, both bail applications are disposed of. However, no coercive actions shall be taken against the petitioners till the bail applications are decided by the learned Trial Court. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case and both the parties may raise their rival contentions on merits before the learned Trial Court.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J JULY 19, 2023/Pallavi
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 3660/2022 VIVEK BORAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Gosain, Mr. Tejasva Mehra, Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Mr. Anushka Baruah, Advs. versus SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Devvrat Yadavm, Mr. Arib Ansari, Prosecutor, SFIO with Ms. Shivani Sharma, Mr. Arjun Kohli and Ms. Lkshita Singh, Advs. + BAIL APPLN. 3661/2022 VIKAS RAJ ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Gosain, Mr. Tejasva Mehra, Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Mr. Anushka Baruah, Advs. versus SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Devvrat Yadavm, Mr. Arib Ansari, Prosecutor, SFIO with Ms. Shivani Sharma, Mr. Arjun Kohli and Ms. Lkshita Singh, Advs. % Date of Decision: 19th July,2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.