- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 23 November 2011
- Bench
- G.S.Sistani
- Case no.
- ARB.P. 234/2011
Judgment
ORDER
23.r.L.20L1 This is a petition under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for appointment of Arbitrator. Notice in this matter was issued. Despite service none appeared on behalf of the respondent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that plaintiff has filed a suit in the Court of District Judge. During the pendency of the suit, respondent had made an application under Section B of Arbitration and Conciliation Act for appointment of Arbitrator. The Additional District Judge had then appointed an Arbitrator, however, subsequent thereto an application was filed by the respondent that Additional DistricLJudge is not competent to appoint an Arbitrator, which has led to filing of the present petition. I have heard counsel for the petitioner. Taking into consideration that none has appeared on behalf of the respondent to oppose present petition and having regard to the fact that respondent had moved an application under Section B of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and an L
2.
¶3c ?
¶6Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. il ^/ Arbitrator was appointed by the order of the trial court, which would show that parties had agreed that all disputes are to be referred to a Sole Arbitrator, present petition is allowed. Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate, (Cell No.981015277 4; Te|.23383535, Chamber No.303, Lawyers' Chamber, DHC), who is present in Court, is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon all disputes and differences including claims and counter claims arising between the parlies. Fee of the Arbitrator shall be borne by the parties equally as per the schedule maintained by Delhi High Court Arbitration Centre. )
¶7Petition stands disposed of. aalr:r, NOVEMBER 23, ZOLL msr ARB.P.234/207L a
Case details
Parties and counsel
, 03. $- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF +- ARB.P.234120tI DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioner Mr. Javed Khan, Adv. V" M/S FALCON ADVERTISERS Through : versus MiS AJS BUILDERS PVT LTD Through : ..... Respondent None. CORAM: FtoN'BLE MR. JUSTTCE G.S.SISTANI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.