VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Ram Ji Prasad v. Raj Kumar Maurya and Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
14 November 2024
Bench
Mini Pushkarnaauthor
Case no.
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 284/2021

Judgment

O R D E R

¶1Perusal of the order sheets show that the petitioner has not put in appearance before this Court even once.

¶2Order dated 15th "The service report of the petitioner is once again awaited, like they were for the last few hearings. Despite repeated efforts, the service could not be affected over the petitioner. Moreover, none has appeared for the petitioner ever on its own. July, 2024, in this regard, reads as under:

List the matter before the Hon'ble Court for further directions on 25.09.2024."

¶3Perusal of the record shows that the present petition was initially filed before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board ("IPAB"), and was thereafter transferred before this Court, upon abolition of the IPAB.

¶4Order sheets of the IPAB are on record, perusal of which, show that there has been no appearance on behalf of the petitioner even before the IPAB since the year 2018.

¶5Accordingly, it is manifest that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the present matter. This is a digitally signed order. 6. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J NOVEMBER 14, 2024 au

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 284/2021 RAM JI PRASAD .....Petitioner Through: None. versus RAJ KUMAR MAURYA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA % 14.11.2024

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.