Ajit Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

O R D E R %

01.09.2026

¶1It is pointed out by Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, learned counsel, that the petitioner is not residing at the place given in the memo of parties/cause title. Even otherwise, the petitioner seeks protection of his younger brother and his wife. Whereabouts of the petitioner's younger brother and wife are not known. No particulars of address, etc. are shown in the petition to enable the police to extend the necessary protection.

¶2In the absence of there being full details to whom and where the protection has to be extended, no mandamus can be directed to the State.

¶3In view of the aforesaid, the petition fails and is hereby dismissed.

¶4The petitioner or his younger brother, however, shall be at liberty to This is a digitally signed order. file a properly constituted petition. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026/P This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010408812026 + W.P.(CRL) 2649/2026 AJIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhant Gautam and Mr. Vivek Gautam, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for the State. SI Vivek Gautam, PS: Badarpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV