VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Kavish Gupta & Anr v. The State of NCT of Delhi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
1 September 2026
Bench
Prateek Jalanauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 2644/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

01.09.2026

¶1By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 0648/2024, dated

09.11.2024, registered at Police Station Palam Village, South-West, Delhi, under Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, alongwith all proceedings arising therefrom.

¶2After some arguments, Ms. Gopashree Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner before the learned Trial Court, including at the stage of framing of charge or consideration of discharge, as may be applicable. This is a digitally signed order. 3. The petition, alongwith the pending applications, is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the aforesaid submission.

¶4It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 SS/SD/ This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010407982026 + W.P.(CRL) 2644/2026 & CRL.M.A. 26788-90/2026 KAVISH GUPTA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Gopashree Raman, Ms. Sonia and Ms. Akanksha, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advocates. SI Shashi Bhushan. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.