VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Brij Mohan Tyagi v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
31 August 2026
Bench
Amit Bansalauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 12528/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

31.08.2026

¶1The present writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs: The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶2The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to a commercial gymnasium in the name of "Spartan Gym" operating from the basement of subject premises and operation of a scrap dealer from the subject premises. Yet another grievance is that the meat shops are running in the near vicinity of the subject premises.

¶3Notably, no photographs have been filed along with writ petition showing the alleged misuse activities.

¶4Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1/MCD on advance notice submits that the aforesaid gym is running without a health license and without paying the requisite conversion charges. He submits that appropriate action in accordance with law shall be taken in respect of the aforesaid gym. As regards the scrap dealer, it is stated that the same is running in an unauthorised manner and necessary action in accordance with law shall be The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. taken.

¶5As regard the meat shops, it is submitted that the meat shops are running pursuant to licenses issued by respondent no.1/MCD.

5.1. The meat shop licenses are produced in Court and are taken on record.

¶6Taking note of the aforesaid submissions, the present writ petition is disposed of while directing respondent no.1/MCD to take appropriate action in accordance with law against the gymnasium as well as the scrap dealer.

¶7In the event the petitioner has any further grievance, he is at liberty to take appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

¶8All rights, contentions and legal remedies of the owner(s)/occupier(s) of gymnasium as well as the scrap dealer are kept open. AMIT BANSAL, J AUGUST 31, 2026 ds The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010404332026 + BRIJ MOHAN TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yaduven Rao, Advocate (Through VC) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kunal Rawat and Ms. Vanshika Varshney, Advocates for MCD Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advocate for GNCTD, PC, CIVIL for R-2 and R-3 (Through VC) Dr. B. Ramaswamy, CGSC with Mr. Shivam Sharma, G.P. for Delhi Police Mr. Sanket Ranjan, Advocate for R-5 and R-6 (Through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.