- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 31 August 2026
- Bench
- Anil Kshetarpal, Shail Jain
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 12524/2026
Judgment
O R D E R %
31.08.2026
¶1Through the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner prays for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order passed on 17.02.2025, whereby its Goods and Services Tax ("GST") registration has been cancelled.
¶2As per Show Cause Notice and the impugned order, the Petitioner"s GST Registration has been cancelled for non-filing of returns. As per Section 30 of the CGST Act, 2017, the Petitioner has a statutory remedy of seeking revocation of cancellation of its GST registration.
¶3Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that, if an application for revocation is filed at this stage, the same may be rejected on the ground of limitation. It is further submitted that the This is a digitally signed order. Petitioner became aware of the cancellation only recently. Cancellation of GST registration entails drastic consequences for a registered person.
¶4In the present case, the GST registration has been cancelled only on account of non-filing of returns. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to furnish the pending returns, if any, and discharge the tax, interest, penalty or any other amount payable in accordance with law
¶5Keeping in view the aforesaid circumstances, the Petitioner is relegated to the statutory remedy of seeking revocation of cancellation of its GST registration. If an application for revocation is filed within a period of one week from today, the Competent Authority shall consider and decide the same on merits, in accordance with law, without rejecting it on the ground of limitation.
¶6With these observations, the present Writ Petition is disposed of.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
SHAIL JAIN, J. AUGUST 31, 2026/sp/ad
This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010404292026 + W.P.(C) 12524/2026 INCEPTRA RETAIL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Arora and Mr. Bharat Berry, Advs. versus SUERINTENDENT, CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.