VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Arun Kumar Sirandhana v. The State of NCT of Delhi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
25 August 2026
Bench
Prateek Jalanauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 3555/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

25.08.2026

¶1By way of the present application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 281/2026, dated 29.07.2026, registered at Police Station Amar Colony, Delhi, under Sections 125/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.

¶2After some arguments, Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present application.

¶3The bail application, alongwith any pending applications, is This is a digitally signed order. BAIL APPLN. 3555/2026 accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

¶4It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 25, 2026 'pv'/SD/ This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

BAIL APPLN. 3555/2026 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010403212026 + BAIL APPLN. 3555/2026 & CRL.M.A. 26476/2026 ARUN KUMAR SIRANDHANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar, Mr. Vijay Kasana, Mr. Naveen Dedha, Mr. Chirag Verma, Mr. Akash Pathak & Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP. SI Himanshu, PS Amar Colony. Mr. Shikhar Sardana & Mr. Ajay Singh, Advocates for Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.