VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Gagan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
25 August 2026
Bench
Amit Bansalauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 12498/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

25.08.2026 CM APPL. 57917/2026 (exemption)

¶1Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 12498/2026

¶2The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to take action against the unauthorized construction being carried out in the property bearing H. No. - Mustatil No.77 Killar No.19/2/2 & 20 Mehrauli Delhi-110030 ('subject property').

¶3From a perusal of the memo of parties, it appears the petitioner is staying at some distance away from the subject property. Hence, the petitioner would not be adversely affected by the construction going on in This is a digitally signed order. W.P.(C) 12498/2026 the subject property.

¶4Be that as it may, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-MCD on advance notice submits that a show cause notice dated 21st August, 2026 has been issued with regard to unauthorized construction in the subject property.

4.1 The show cause notice is taken on record.

¶5Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of while directing the respondent-MCD to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

¶6All rights, contentions and legal remedies of the private respondents are kept open.

¶7Pending application stands disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J AUGUST 25, 2026 Vivek/- This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

W.P.(C) 12498/2026 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010402822026 + W.P.(C) 12498/2026 with CM APPL. 57916/2026 and CM APPL. 57917/2026 GAGAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Priytam Gaur, Advocate (through VC) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, Ms. Shruti Goel, Ms. Neha Ghugtyal, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.