VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Anil Aggarwal v. Vaishali Srivastava

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
25 August 2026
Bench
Harish Vaidyanathanauthor
Case no.
RC.REV. 308/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

25.08.2026

¶1The present Petition, filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 ["DRC Act"], seeks to assail the Order dated

28.02.2026 ["Impugned Order"] passed by the learned SCJ-cum-RC, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi ["learned RC"] in Eviction Petition, bearing RC ARC No. 34/2023 ["Eviction Petition"], whereby, upon conclusion of the trial, the learned RC has passed an Order of Eviction against the Petitioner.

¶2Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions of the Petitioner, who is present in person, submits that the Petitioner does not wish to press the present Petition.

¶3Learned counsel for the Petitioner, however, submits that the Petitioner prays that he may be permitted to retain the Subject premises till 31.03.2027. He further submits that such retention may This is a digitally signed order. be subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- per month, in terms of the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. v. Federal Motors (P) Ltd. [(2005) 1 SCC 705].

¶4Learned counsel for the Respondent, on instructions, submits that he has no objection to the submissions and proposal made by learned counsel for the Petitioner.

¶5Accordingly, the Petitioner is permitted to retain the subject premises till 31.03.2027, subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions.

¶6The Petitioner is, accordingly, directed to file an Affidavit of Undertaking, setting out the aforementioned terms and conditions, within a period of two (02) weeks from today, failing which he shall be liable to vacate the premises forthwith.

¶7It is also made clear that, in the event of breach of the said undertaking, the Respondent shall be liable to such action as may be permissible in law, including initiation of contempt proceedings against the Petitioner.

¶8The present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, stands disposed of in aforementioned terms.

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. AUGUST 25, 2026/rk/DJ

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010402042026 + RC.REV. 308/2026, CM APPL. 57804/2026 (Stay), CM APPL. 57805/2026 (Ex.) & CM APPL. 57806/2026 (Delay of 24 days in Re-filing the petition) ANIL AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given versus VAISHALI SRIVASTAVA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohit Bansal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.